Ordering food online is Dear Utol (2025): Doctor, Doctor I'm Sick Episode 41supposed to be convenient— but Domino's Pizza needs to ensure that it's convenient for everyone.
The Supreme Court passed on reviewing a case from the pizza chain Monday, which questioned whether it has to make its website and mobile app accessible for people with disabilities.
This decision is a victory for blind people and those with limited vision who need to access websites and apps just as easily as any sighted person. The decision could also inspire others to sue retailers to make sure their websites and mobile apps are accessible.
The case, known as Domino’s Pizza LLC. v. Guillermo Robles, started when a blind man, Guillermo Robles, sued Domino's in 2016 after he was unable to order food from the pizza chain using screen reading technology. His attorneys cited the American with Disabilities Act (ADA), which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit agreed with Robles, arguing under the ADA that customers should be able to access "the services of a public accommodation." In this case, that means Domino's website and mobile app.
The pizza chain, on the other hand, argued that the ADA shouldn't apply to online spaces.
Domino's wanted the Supreme Court to review the 9th Circuit's decision, but because it won't, the lower court's ruling will remain in place.
“The blind and visually impaired must have access to websites and apps to fully and equally participate in modern society - something nobody disputes,” Robles' lawyer, Joe Manning, said in a statement to CNBC. “This outcome furthers that critical objective for them and is a credit to our society.”
Christina Brandt-Young, managing attorney at Disability Rights Advocates, told Mashable that the ADA should indeed include websites. "[The ADA] always applied to effective communication between businesses and their customers and that's what Domino's uses its websites for — to communicate with their customers."
Predictably, Domino's is disappointed with the Supreme Court's decision.
"Creating a nation-wide standard will eliminate the tsunami of website accessibility litigation that has been filed by plaintiffs’ lawyers exploiting the absence of a standard for their own benefit, and chart a common path for both businesses and non-profit institutions to follow in meeting the accessibility needs of the disabled community," Domino's said in an online statement.
Since Domino's wants to keep fighting, it'll have to do so in the lower courts. While Brandt-Young says it's unlikely that Domino's would bring this case back to the Supreme Court, she believes the Supreme Court could take up another, similar case in the future. If differing judicial opinions arise then the Supreme Court could reconsider and take up the case in the future.
This isn't the first time, companies have come under fire over their allegedly inaccessible websites. As the Wall Street Journal reported, over 240 businesses in the U.S. were sued over this issue since the beginning of 2015.
While many of these companies settled, Domino's seems to be bracing itself for the long run.
UPDATE: Oct. 7, 2019, 5:19 p.m. EDT Updated with comment from Christina Brandt-Young, managing attorney at Disability Rights Advocates.
UPDATE: Oct. 8, 2019, 1:00 p.m. EDT Updated to clarify statements from Brandt-Young and to provide more details about the judicial process.
Topics Social Good Supreme Court
Zayn Malik is writing an autobiography and we have some burning questionsApple Watch Series 2 review: Less silly, more usableGmail goes down for some users, prompts social media freakoutGmail goes down for some users, prompts social media freakoutHey look, it's your nightmare come to life: Spider found baked into cookieManchester experiences epic storms, social media explodes with pics, videosThis website allows you to make the LaCroix flavor of your dreamsTom Brady has some very harsh words for strawberries4 Paralympic athletes clock faster race time than Olympic gold medalistDiego the tortoise is helping save his species by having lots of sexNBA star whose team blew huge Finals lead endorses Hillary Clinton for presidentBudding soccer star Christian Pulisic is America's saving graceStudy details the sugar industry's attempt to shape science5 new fall shows you need to watch9 reasons you should download iOS 10 nowTim Cook explains why AirPods won't slip out of your ears and get lost4 Paralympic athletes clock faster race time than Olympic gold medalistJeff Bridges is perfectly cast in new Uggs commercialsHow to watch NFL Thursday night games on TwitterOur brains still light up with emotions even when we relax, study finds Elon Musk's X fined over $400,000 for refusing to address child abuse concerns 'The Platform 2' review: A lesson in how to make a sci Every book in 'Heartstopper' Season 3 Today's Hurdle hints and answers for October 2 M3 MacBook Air vs. M3 MacBook Pro: Which Mac is best for you? Besiktas vs. Eintracht Frankfurt 2024 livestream: Watch Europa League for free How to turn off touch screen on Chromebook Arkadium mini crossword answers for October 3 Facebook cracks down on celebrity deepfake scams after $43 million in losses for Australians Best free online courses from Harvard University Use Amazon Photos (for free) and get a $15 credit for Prime Big Deal Days Best robot vacuum deal: Get the Shark Detect Pro for under $120 at Walmart Moo Deng sucks, actually Cuffing season: what is it and how do you navigate it while single? Apple's Phone SE 4 will surprise with new display and top cameras, report claims TikTok could pull music from Phoebe Bridgers, Mitski, and Nirvana from the platform Benfica vs. Atletico Madrid 2024 livestream: Watch Champions League for free Aston Villa vs. Bayern Munich 2024 livestream: Watch Champions League for free Unauthorised Crumbl Cookie pop 'V/H/S/Beyond' review: Should you watch if you're new to the franchise?
2.5401s , 10132.9453125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【Dear Utol (2025): Doctor, Doctor I'm Sick Episode 41】,Co-creation Information Network