Earlier this week,The Immediate Stages of the Erotic, or Musical Eroticism the Hallmark Channel pulled four ads for wedding website Zola because they featured a same-sex couple, bending to pressure from conservative group One Million Moms. Now it seems Hallmark is bending back the other way, pledging to reinstate the blushing brides after widespread backlash.
A Hallmark Channel spokesperson initially told the New York Timesthe ads' removal was due to a company policy "not to air overt public displays of affection in our sponsored advertisement, regardless of the participants."
However, Zola disputed this claim.
"The only difference between the commercials that were flagged and the ones that were approved was that the commercials that did not meet Hallmark’s standards included a lesbian couple kissing," Zola's chief marketing officer Mike Chi told the Hollywood Reporter. "Hallmark approved a commercial where a heterosexual couple kissed."
The hashtag #BoycottHallmarkChannel quickly spread on Twitter in the wake of Hallmark's decision to pull the ads, as celebrities such as Ellen DeGeneres, Monica Lewinsky, and Bridget Regan drew attention to the issue. Zola also pulled all their advertising from Hallmark.
"All kisses, couples and marriages are equal celebrations of love and we will no longer be advertising on Hallmark," said Chi.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.
This Tweet is currently unavailable. It might be loading or has been removed.SEE ALSO: Hallmark Channel faces online backlash for pulling LGBT ads
Now, Hallmark has said it will reinstate the pulled ads, giving viewers back their lesbians this Christmas.
"The Crown Media team has been agonizing over this decision as we’ve seen the hurt it has unintentionally caused," Hallmark Cards president and CEO Mike Perry said in a statement. "Said simply, they believe this was the wrong decision."
"We are truly sorry for the hurt and disappointment this has caused ... Across our brand, we will continue to look for ways to be more inclusive and celebrate our differences."
The company's films aren't exactly known for their diversity, with this incident only serving to highlight this fact. Nevertheless, Hallmark claims it "is, and always has been, committed to diversity and inclusion — both in our workplace as well as the products and experiences we create."
"It is never Hallmark's intention to be divisive or generate controversy," said a statement released by the company. "We are an inclusive company and have a track record to prove it." Oddly in light of what kicked off this furore, Hallmark backed its claims by saying it "feature[s] LGBTQ couples in commercials."
Hallmark has been making noises about increasing diversity for years, but has struggled to follow through. In November, the Hollywood Reporter found only four of Hallmark's 24 original holiday movies this year feature black leads, down from five out of 21 last year. None feature LGBTQ characters.
Now that the company is seeing real financial consequences to the glacial pace at which they're changing, there's much more incentive for them to finally start walking the walk.
"The Hallmark Channel will be reaching out to Zola to reestablish our partnership and reinstate the commercials," Hallmark said.
Jodie's weightTesla's German gigafactory finally opensHeineken pushes metaverse 'beer' in DecentralandNicole Maines joins 'Supergirl,' becoming TV's first trans superheroDad with diarrhea gets wholesome pep talk from 4Trump blames his support of Russia on a double negative and no one's buying it'Time' morphs Trump and Putin's faces in horrifying cover you'll never unseeHeineken pushes metaverse 'beer' in DecentralandTile launches antiMake fun of outdated sexual scorekeeping with the first base memeWatch this adorable toddler play fetch with a dog over a fenceSomeone please stop these copycat emoji Twitter accountsThe congressmen against net neutrality who receive money from telecomsMaserati goes all in on electric with 5 new EVsMake fun of outdated sexual scorekeeping with the first base memeMeryl Streep and Cher's kiss is one of the few good things to happen in forever'Windfall' review: A stunning Netflix thriller that keeps you guessing until the very endNASA Mars helicopter captures a stunning view of the Martian desertTile launches antiThe best dog accounts on Instagram to get your fluff fix Object Lesson: Undermining by The Paris Review Doyle’s Journals, Rowling’s House by Sadie Stein Wordy Joyce, Papal Deals by Sadie Stein See You There: The Paris Review in L.A. by Sadie Stein Happy Birthday, Ballpoint! by Sadie Stein Is Nothing Sacred? The Brontë Chapel Is Sacked by Sadie Stein Paranoid Mazurka in C Literary Salons, Unfilmable Books by Sadie Stein Dreaming in Welsh by Pamela Petro Mimes, Tattoos, and Whales by Sadie Stein What We’re Doing Tonight: TPR at Greenlight Books! by Sadie Stein Tonight: “Get in the back of the van!” by Sadie Stein A Week in Beirut by Nathan Deuel Magic Hour: An Interview with Gregory Crewdson by Elisabeth Donnelly See You There: The Paris Review at the Strand, Tonight! by The Paris Review Gun Found in Donated Book, and Other Book News by Sadie Stein What We’re Loving: Simultaneity, Latin Lovers by The Paris Review Urban Renewal: An Interview with Adrian Tomine by Peter Terzian Like: Facebook and Schadenfreude by Francesca Mari “The Lottery”: PG
3.1904s , 10193.625 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【The Immediate Stages of the Erotic, or Musical Eroticism】,Co-creation Information Network