【Poor Things】

Those seeking a visa to enter the United States will now have Poor Thingsto air out their dirty social media laundry, which could bring the approval process to an agonizingly slow pace.

The Trump administration recently released a lengthy new questionnaire for visa applicants that goes above and beyond all previous such measures, according to a Reuters report. After a contentious public comment period, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the expansive questionnaire on May 23.

Among the new fields is a section dedicated solely to social media, in which applicants are asked to provide their "unique user name" for any online service used to "create or share content" over the past five years.

Consular officials can also now ask applicants for all prior passport numbers, email addresses, phone numbers, and 15 years of biographical information under the new protocol, making the application process much more burdensome for those looking to enter the United States.

Completing all fields of the questionnaire is voluntary -- but the language at the bottom of the form clearly states that failure to provide the information "may delay or prevent the processing of an individual visa application."

SEE ALSO: Spare a thought for the guy detained in U.S. for allegedly overstaying by 90 minutes

The strict new questionnaire doesn't exactly come as a surprise. The State Department first proposed the new application parameters early last month as part of its initiative to follow through on the president's promise for "extreme vetting" of those entering the United States.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

The new application isn't as visible as the failed travel bans that the president has attempted to push through via executive orders -- but they could affect even more people.

Reuters reports that State Department officials said they will request the additional information of applicants when it's decided that extra steps are needed to "confirm identity or conduct more rigorous national security vetting," a condition that essentially gives official carte blanche to conduct the searches on whomever they please, for any reason.

That's a shift from what was originally described when the initiative was first announced--then, only visa applicants "who have been determined to warrant additional scrutiny in connection with terrorism or other national security-related visa ineligibilities" were said to be facing the additional scrutiny. The State Department estimated only 0.5 percent of the annual applicant pool, or about 65,000 people, would be under the additional scrutiny.

Original image has been replaced. Credit: Mashable

The application isn't so intrusive that it asks for accessto those social media accounts -- requests like that are more likely to come from border officials on the spot, after all -- but the barrier for entry into the country is now raised.

Think about the various profiles and online accounts you've set up over the years. Can you recall every single one of them?

The same goes for the 15-year window required for the biographical information, which could also be used to catch applicants making innocent mistakes and give officials an excuse to keep them out of the country.

It's just another step to make it easier for the administration to block anyone they want from entering the U.S. -- whether they're a true threat to national security or not.

---

Featured Video For You

---

World travelers will love this suitcase that doubles as a scooter

---

Topics Social Media Donald Trump Politics Immigration

• Life
• Entertainment
• Social Good
• Deals
• Digital Culture
• Science
• Tech
• Shopping

• The Secret Policeman at the Marathon
• 'The Fall of the House of Usher's Netflix posters were the biggest clue all along
• Best smart Thermostat deal: Get a refurbished Amazon smart thermostat for just $29.99
• What is 'Buy Now, Pay Later' and who does it hurt?
• Sail Trimmers
• “You Waspy Wasp”: Pessoa’s Love Letters Take a Bizarre Turn
• Wordle today: The answer and hints for October 18
• TikTok recipe for air fryer chicken skewers is surprisingly delicious and simple
• The Last Line of Defense
• The best products that have gone viral so far in 2022

• Is your iPhone X unresponsive in the cold? Apple is working on a fix
• FX cuts Louis C.K. following sexual misconduct reports
• Gal Gadot met Brooklynn Prince and we're so jealous of both of them
• Can Amazon finally give us the 'Lord of the Rings' that Tolkien would have wanted?
• Brits are responding to this Christmas advert in the most British way possible
• Twitter increases display name character count to 50
• Hope Solo accuses former FIFA president of sexual assault
• Qualcomm just killed the world's biggest tech deal
• Axiem Systems' "Notch Remover" app removes the 'notch' from iPhone X
• Email bot wastes a scammer's time with mindless chit

• News From Nowhere Episode 11
• “You Waspy Wasp”: Pessoa’s Love Letters Take a Bizarre Turn
• One Night Only! The Implosion of the Riviera, Monaco Tower
• Who owns the rights to your face?
• Momentive’s Hundred Days
• Amazon now has passkey support, but there are limitations.
• Best WiFi extender deal: The TP
• D. W. Griffith’s “Intolerance” Changed Life Outside the Movies
• Sméagol in the Sky
• Growing Up in the Gun Belt

• Summon Your Tech Kids to the White House Day
• Staff Picks: Apichatpong Weerasethakul, Han Kang, Luis Felipe Fabre
• The best products that have gone viral so far in 2022
• The 11 best and funniest tweets of the week, including Spirit Halloween and Pink Sauce
• Putting People First in Pennsylvania
• Do Virgos deserve Beyoncé's 'Virgo's Groove'?
• Forty (More) Hink Pinks: The Answers
• One Night Only! The Implosion of the Riviera, Monaco Tower
• The Tarot of Alejandro Jodorowsky
• On the Enduring Appeal of Frederick Ashton’s La Fille Mal Gardée