【indian aunties sex videos】

Facebook is indian aunties sex videostaking a small step to stop the spread of coronavirus misinformation.

The company announced a new anti-misinformation measure it's taking in a company blog post on Thursday morning. Any user who likes or otherwise interacts with material that Facebook has deemed harmful enough to delete from the site will be encouraged to check out the World Health Organization's coronavirus myth-busting site.

Facebook's notification doesn't scold you for liking false content, but does give you the option to share the facts. Credit: facebook

It's not a mind-blowing measure by any means, and it starts to sound less effective once you look at the finer details. Facebook's blog post talks about the dozens of fact-checking organizations the site works with to review content on the site and put warning labels on debunked articles. Only content that encourages "imminent physical harm," such as posts advocating for phony coronavirus remedies or preventatives, are removed.

Mashable Light Speed Want more out-of-this world tech, space and science stories? Sign up for Mashable's weekly Light Speed newsletter. By clicking Sign Me Up, you confirm you are 16+ and agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Thanks for signing up!

SEE ALSO: Thousands of political ads are sneaking around Facebook’s disclosure rules

The blog post makes it seem like only users who interact with posts removed by Facebook will see the warning, as opposed those who just see a post with a warning label. Since it's theoretically possible for a post to spread dangerous lies about the virus without necessarily encouraging "imminent physical harm," some folks who need to see the WHO's page might not be directed toward it.

Facebook confirmed as much to Mashable, with a spokesperson telling us in an email that only users who interact with posts removed for promoting physical harm will get the notice. Those who have shared or attempt to share something with a warning label will get a separate notification.

It's not the first policy change Facebook has made during the pandemic. Educational materials from various health authorities have shown up on News Feed for a few weeks, while the company has given a little bit of money to the journalism industry in a time when facts are vital. Still, given the prominence of misinformation on the platform, it might be reasonable to implement more aggressive measures.

UPDATE: April 16, 2020, 2:39 p.m. EDT Added clarification from Facebook on how the policy works.

Topics Facebook COVID-19

• Tech
• Science
• Life
• Entertainment
• Social Good
• Deals
• Games
• Digital Culture

• The Best CPU & GPU Purchases of 2017
• New York Times prints terrifying list of all of Donald Trump's Twitter insults
• Is Airbnb the reason renters can't find an affordable place to live in Sydney?
• Jordan Peele's 'Us' is a force to be reckoned with: Review
• Super Bowl LIX livestream: Watch Eagles vs Chiefs on Tubi
• Is Airbnb the reason renters can't find an affordable place to live in Sydney?
• Slack's dark mode on mobile is now available to all users
• Seth Rogen and Charlize Theron can't save awkward rom
• Elon Musk told Donald Trump what to do about the Paris Climate Agreement
• Elizabeth Warren isn't pulling punches with Facebook, after ads taken down

• How to stack emojis in iMessage
• Best Nintendo Switch game deal: Save $10 on the recently
• Trump to allow imports of elephant trophies on 'case
• Skates in the deep sea may incubate eggs near 'black smoker' vents
• NYT's The Mini crossword answers for March 26
• Best gift card deal: A $100 DoorDash gift card is down to just $85 at Best Buy.
• Why don't we have AI
• 'Godzilla x Kong: The New Empire' review: Do the puny humans spoil the fun again?
• Crumbling National Park Service needs money and solutions
• Tributes flow following the death of beloved scientist Stephen Hawking

• Best Presidents' Day deal: Save $44 on Fitbit Charge 6
• Kylie Jenner finally explains why she mistook a pig for a chicken
• Your social media photos could be training facial recognition AI without your consent
• New York Times prints terrifying list of all of Donald Trump's Twitter insults
• The Portable Workstation: Dell XPS 13 + 32 UltraSharp 4K Monitor
• Flickr announces all public Creative Commons works are now protected from deletion
• Donald Trump made money off his name – but that could be ending
• Elon Musk slams SEC 'overreach,' says he cut his Tesla
• Optogenetics: A Virtual Reality System for Controlling Living Cells
• Dark mode for Google Chrome is finally out on Mac

• Cibao FC vs. Guadalajara 2025 livestream: Watch Concacaf Champions Cup for free
• Icelandic women walked out of work at 2:38 p.m. on a Monday for an important reason
• Donald Trump's first major newspaper endorsement is not exactly a shocker
• The 'Dark Knight' trilogy returns to theaters for a 70mm IMAX tour
• Optogenetics: A Virtual Reality System for Controlling Living Cells
• 'The Bachelor' contestants find love on the show, but with each other
• Huawei caught using stock images to promote smartphone's camera
• Jordan Peele's 'Us' is a force to be reckoned with: Review
• Man City vs. Real Madrid 2025 livestream: Watch Champions League for free
• Tesla hides hilarious secret message inside of Model Y invitations