When Bob Jones performed one of Victoria's first liver transplants in 1988982 Archives he could not imagine that 29 years later he'd be talking about artificial intelligence and online dating.
Jones is the director of Austin Health's Victorian liver transplant unit in Melbourne, Australia, and along with his colleague Lawrence Lau, he has helped develop an algorithm that could potentially better match organ donors with organ recipients.
SEE ALSO: This futuristic car is so intuitive it knows your needs — and even your emotionsComparing it to the metrics behind dating site eHarmony, Jone said they planned to use the specially-designed AI to improve the accuracy of matching liver donors and recipients, hopefully resulting in less graft failures and fewer patient deaths.
"It's a specially designed machine learning algorithm using multiple donor and recipient features to predict the outcome," he explained.
The team plugged around 25 characteristics of donors and recipients into their AI, using the data points to retrospectively predict what would happen to organ grafts.
"We used all the basic things like sex, age, underlying disease, blood type," he said. "And then there are certain characteristics about the donor ... and all the parameters that might indicate the liver might be upset."
Using the AI to assess the retrospective results of 75 adult patients who'd had transplants, they found the method predicted graft failure 30 days post-transplant at an accuracy of 84 percent compared to 68 percent with current methods.
"It really meant for the first time we could assess an organ's suitability in a quantitive way," he added, "as opposed to the current method, which really comes down to the position of the doctor eyeballing all the data and making a call based on their experience."
Improving the accuracy of organ donor matches is vital, because as Jones put it, "it's an extraordinary, precious gift from one Australian to another."
"At that stage, it was an extraordinarily risky adventure for everybody, including the patient."
The study has been submitted to a number of academic journals, he said, and the next step will be to use it prospectively in a randomised trial (with ethical approvals).
Jeremy Chapman, director of renal transplantation at Westmead Hospital and Transplant Australia board member, said the preliminary results seemed positive.
However he emphasised it was in its earliest stages, and should be thought of as helping to "inform the decision and not create the decision" to undertake a transplant.
He also suggested that the way liver transplants are performed in Melbourne may mean the algorithm is not immediately applicable in other regions. "There may be particular features in the way they do the procedures [in Melbourne] ... that means that what works in Melbourne may not work in Cincinnati," he said.
As an expert in kidney transplants specifically, he added that the system for organ transplants in renal cases was based not only in predicted outcomes but also on factors like equity and the optimal utilisation of available organs.
"You could easily improve the outcome of the transplants you do by only taking organs from the very fittest donors and putting them in the very fittest recipients," he said. "Using the data we have on past results and trying to optimise the allocation system for fairness, utility and outcome is an ongoing process."
Jones emphasised that their project is in the "very, early stages," but said they're interested in adding to a thorough process that includes not-so-easily quantifiable considerations, as Chapman mentioned. "The parameters we put in are somewhat universal," he said. "But sometimes a number doesn't convey quite how a patient is."
Either way, for Jones, the future will be exciting thanks to new technologies, especially compared to his earlier days in surgery.
"At that stage, it was an extraordinarily risky adventure for everybody, including the patient," he added. "We didn't even dream of the subtlety of being able to properly match a donor with a recipient."
Topics Artificial Intelligence
Previous:Time to Unite
Jaguar's allThe causes of Southern California's terrifying wildfire siegeAmazon Prime Video is now available on Apple TVAmazon Prime Video is now available on Apple TVRyan Reynolds to star in liveSufjan Stevens just released a song about Tonya HardingTeam behind Time's Person of the Year issue was all womenBitcoin is the perfect asset for the age of millennialsThat 'Frozen' short everyone hated is coming to ABCInstagram's testing a standalone Direct messaging appWho's the least popular Star Wars character ever? Hint: It's not Jar JarIs Game of Thrones confusing? Stannis actor had no idea what was going onWhy tech workers are leaving San FranciscoJaguar's allSia responds on Twitter to article questioning the ethics of putting child dancer in the limelightStarbucks releases a Christmas Tree Frappuccino for THE HOLIDAYSThese 10 movies turning 10 in 2018 will make you feel old'The Last Jedi' will be the bestThe 10 best albums of 2017There's a baby inside of Norman Reedus in this trailer On Taylor Swift’s Passive Printing and Binding Wikipedia, One Entry at a Time F. W. Murnau’s Head Is Missing from His Grave Nick Sousanis on How Comics Help Us Make Connections Rubbernecking Did the Erie Canal Change Our Vowel Sounds? Hart Crane’s Bizarre, Audacious Unpublished Poem The Treasure Maps of Pamela Singh Beauty Is Scary For Graduates: The Paris Review’s Commencement Gift Box How Men’s Magazines Changed Our Idea of Bachelorhood 100 Billboards Celebrate the Allure of the West My Parents’ News Cleanse On the Origin—and the Modern Ezra Pound Chastises James Joyce’s Potty Humor A 1922 Science Fiction Novel About Grafting Monkey Glands Jhumpa Lahiri on James Salter’s “Light Years” Christopher Robin Is Saying His Prayers Searching for Cy Twombly in Lexington, Virginia Teju Cole on Clubbing in Lagos
2.2356s , 8223.953125 kb
Copyright © 2025 Powered by 【1982 Archives】,Co-creation Information Network